Free Download DVD’s from internet, Is it Legal or Illegal?

There are programs on the net which allow you to search for free downloadable dvds and then download them to your computer. But before I tell you what more and more people are using to watch and keep backups of their favorite Dvd’s, I just want to let you know what you need to do.
If you are like me, I am like an employee at blockbuster, except I don’t get paid, Every worker at my local blockbuster knows me by name because of how many movies I rent. however this movie love has caused me to consider other sources to get movies. Alternatively, the internet was my next stop. I searched for “download any dvd free” and came up with a great site (listed below) however, if you want to download dvds for free to your computer, there are sites on the net which allows you to do this.
Most sites offer you a couple of different options. One of them is a “per download fee”. This involves paying for every movie you want to download. The problem with this is that it can quickly can add up. As stated above with blockbuster.
The other option to download dvds for free, and the one which more people are turning to is to pay a one off membership to a site. In these type of site, once you join up, you can download any free dvd as you want. If you would like to download every comedy movie (as an example) and and keep it in your collection, then a one of membership fee will worth it for you.
If you really want to free downloadable dvds, then it will be worth having a look at a site which offers you a one off membership fee. This will provide you with the best long term outcome. Now you now you can download dvds for free, go and get them today.

Legal market response to the issue surrounding regulation of tobacco banning menthol

The issue surrounding the regulation of tobacco: whether to ban menthol, carries great importance for public health advocates and tobacco executives. Adding menthol to cigarettes may increase the likelihood of addiction and make it easier for young people to start smoking, according to preliminary findings of a Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) advisory panel considering whether to recommend a ban or otherwise restrict menthol cigarettes.

The NBPA does not endorse or support any product that causes harm to the black community, produces ill health effects, or causes addiction. Yet menthol cigarettes constitute 30 percent of the current U.S. tobacco market. It is reasonable to conclude that any action banning 30 percent of a currently legal market would create and enhance the contraband cigarette market. This certainly causes concern to many law enforcement officers around the nation.

In this illegal market, we have already observed thefts and robberies of local stores; crimes against consumers; and illicit sales in otherwise legitimate business. These activities were brought on by tax increases that were believed to serve the greater good. We are coping with cigarette smuggling from one state to another based on taxes alone.

In fact, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives believes the illegal cigarette market to be the number-one underground market in the world.

Again, the NBPA does not support or endorse products that contribute to deaths among the people we represent. But the question is not one of tobacco usage, but whether a ban on menthol in cigarettes will make the public safer or backfire with far more damaging consequences.

Menthol cigarettes are especially popular among young smokers. According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 62 percent of middle-school students who smoke begin with menthol cigarettes, whose minty taste can mask the harshness of tobacco.

It is our belief that if menthol cigarettes are banned, contraband versions mimicking name brands will enter the flourishing illegal market. These new unregulated products would be sold in cigarette houses, on corners, in cars and back alleyways. Who will ask the young smoker to present identification in the back alley or at the door of a vehicle? Who will regulate the ingredients that are placed in cigarettes produced illegally? We have no desire to send 30 percent of smokers underground to purchase menthol cigarettes.

Our communities do not need another avenue of crime to deal with, and overtaxed local law enforcement officials do not need to be distracted from devoting time to the more serious criminal issues that plague our neighborhoods.

The legal cigarette market contributes $40 billion a year to state and federal governments in taxes. The NBPA would like to see more of these tax revenues spent and focused on smoking prevention and cessation programs, especially among our youth. Funding law enforcement programs and operations that focus on youth campaigns and prevention programs will have a positive effect in our communities.

Australian legal practitioners in fight against legal assistance funding cuts

The Federal Government is under increasing pressure to reverse millions of dollars in funding cuts to legal aid and community legal centres around Australia.

All state and territory Attorneys-General have written to federal Attorney-General George Brandis, warning the Commonwealth’s current funding plan for legal assistance will set the fight against domestic violence and Indigenous disadvantage back decades.

Last year’s budget cut $15 million from legal aid commissions and $6 million from community legal centres.

“There are certainly places in Australia where there are centres that may have to close,” Michael Smith from the National Association of Community Legal Centres (NACLC) told ABC’s AM program.

“There are centres that don’t know whether they’ll be able to stay open and whether those lawyers will be able to continue.

“Even if centres are able to open often those community lawyers are seeing 300 or 400 clients a year, so that’s a lot of people who are going to miss out if those services aren’t there.

“Certainly demand for assistance around family violence is growing like we’ve never seen before.”

The current national partnership agreement for legal assistance services expires at the end of June, and the state and territories are asking Senator Brandis to set out their proposed future funding no later than the end of March.

The letter signed by all seven Attorneys-General called on Senator Brandis to reverse the existing cuts made to legal services, and guarantee no further funding reductions would be made to Legal Aid Commission, Community Legal Centres, and the Aboriginal Legal Service.

If these cuts continue … people facing poverty, people facing homelessness — they will be the people who lose out.
ACT Attorney-General Simon Corbell

“These proposals will affect the most vulnerable members in our community, including foremost women and children who are victims of, or at risk of family violence, as well as Indigenous Australians,” the letter said.

“It is difficult to reconcile these actions with the Prime Minister’s recent recognition of the importance of tackling domestic and family violence and closing the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians as national issues.

“Cutting funding to the services which help these vulnerable members of our community, at this time, is short sighted and ill conceived.

“Such a move will further set us back decades in tackling this important issue.”

Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister, Alan Tudge, defended the level of Commonwealth funding for legal aid.

“We’ve got an absolute commitment to providing good funding for the front line legal aid services for vulnerable people,” he told Sky News.

“We’ve committed $1.3 billion over the next four years.”

Mr Tudge said there would be new funding arrangements for legal service organisations from July, which will be announced in the May budget.

“Instead of the Commonwealth funding them directly we will fund them via the state governments and we’re in a process at the moment of working through that.”
Cuts ‘contradict’ domestic violence concerns

ACT Attorney-General Simon Corbell said the states and territories were united.

“It’s very significant that regardless of our political persuasions state and territory attorneys are standing together to tell the federal Attorney-General and the Abbott government that these cuts to legal aid can not stand,” he said.

“If these cuts continue we will see people needing representation and legal advice on domestic violence questions, representation because they’re Indigenous and caught up in the justice system, people facing poverty, people facing homelessness — they will be the people who lose out.”

Victoria’s Attorney-General, Martin Pakula, said cutting legal aid contradicted the Federal Government’s campaign against family violence.

“Our community legal centres do an enormous amount of work supporting the victims of family violence,” he said.

“Now for Tony Abbott and George Brandis to be talking about wanting to deal with the epidemic of family violence but at the same time talking about cuts in assistance to CLCs and Legal Aid is just completely hypocritical.”

West Australian Attorney-General Michael Mischin said he was concerned about WA’s dwindling funding.

He said with WA consistently receiving the second lowest per capita contribution from the Commonwealth of any of the states and territories, it could not afford to lose any further funding.

“Legal aid funding in Western Australia has been dropping considerably over the past 15-odd years, with the State increasing its contribution to legal aid funding across the state, but the Commonwealth share dropping,” he said.

“I’ve got to say that the prospect of us being able to significantly fill up the slack that the Commonwealth has left over the last 15 years is pretty grim.

“I understand the Commonwealth’s problems, but there are certain fundamental obligations that ought not to be abrogated.”

New South Wales Premier Mike Baird said he was also concerned his state would not be able to make up the funding shortfall.

“We understand the impact that they are providing and the service they are providing to some of the most disadvantaged in the state so the Attorney-General is absolutely right, as other Attorney-Generals (sic) across the country are, to ask the Federal Attorney-General to reconsider that,” he said.
Concerns funding cuts will lead to delays in court system

The Federal Government also cut $43 million from legal advocacy services, saying it wanted to direct the funding to frontline services.

Northern Territory Attorney-General John Elferink said while he understood what Senator Brandis was trying to achieve, it would lead to delays in the court system instead.

“If somebody is unrepresented and facing a murder charge or unrepresented and facing a serious indictable offence, then clearly a court would be extremely reluctant to hear a person or a case in front of them without proper legal representation,” Mr Elferink said.

“Particularly if that person is not as sophisticated as somebody else in the ways of the criminal justice system, particularly the Western criminal justice system.”

A spokesman for Senator Brandis said the letter would be given consideration.

He said the Government was committed to protecting the most vulnerable members of the community and would continue to provide a “very substantial” amount of funding for legal assistance.

The spokesman said funding to the states and territories would be considered as part of this year’s budget process.

The Federal Government also announced this week it would fund half of a $30-million national awareness campaign, along with the states and territories.

The NACLC said while that was important, it was not enough.

“We think that prevention is really important and that community awareness will make a difference in the long term about preventing family violence before it occurs,” Mr Smith said.

“Certainly people need to be aware of those problems, but legal services and other support services are totally stretched already.

“So the danger is if we’re only doing more awareness raising, it’ll just create more demand, and the crisis will get worse.”

Guaranteed Free Legal Help and Advice by U.S. Constitution

People charged with a crime that might lead to imprisonment, who cannot afford a lawyer, are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution to receive free legal counsel. People in this situation should request the appointment of a lawyer when they first appear in court. Legal aid programs are available to help those who need legal help but cannot afford to pay for the services of an attorney.

In non-criminal or “civil” cases, a person does not have the right to a free lawyer. However, there are many legal aid and pro bono programs, which can provide them with legal help at no charge. Individuals or families with annual incomes below the federal poverty guidelines are generally eligible to receive free legal assistance. In addition, people who are elderly, disabled, the victims of domestic violence, enlisted in the military, or who are in other special circumstances, may be eligible for help, regardless of their income.

When determining whether or not to accept a case, free legal service providers consider several factors. The most important of which are legal matters that impact:

  • A household’s ability to meet its basic human needs for protection from violence and abuse
  • Access to medical assistance
  • Subsistence income

Some of the cases commonly accepted for more extensive legal representation include:

  • Domestic Violence Orders of Protection (when legal representation is needed)
  • Denials/terminations of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits
  • Financial exploitation or abuse of the elderly or persons with disabilities
  • Problems associated with nursing home care or paying for nursing home care

Legal aid offices employ staff lawyers to provide help to low-income clients. The lawyers are usually experienced in the types of problems that poor clients often encounter. In addition, there are community-based programs that provide legal assistance. Some of these operate with small budgets and do not have the resources to serve all eligible people. Therefore, they may turn away some applicants.

Federally-funded organizations in Illinois which provide free legal services to the poor are:

1. Land of Lincoln Legal Assistance Foundation http://www.lollaf.org/ 618.462.0029; 800.642.5570, serving the southern half of Illinois
2. Prairie State Legal Services http://www.pslegal.org/ 815.965.2134, serving the northern half of the state except Cook County
3. Legal Assistance Foundation of Metropolitan Chicago http://www.lafchicago.org/ 312.341.1070, serving Cook County

Those unable to obtain assistance from a legal aid office can turn to the pro bono programs that are often sponsored by local bar associations, where lawyers in private practice volunteer to take on cases free of charge for those who cannot afford to pay. Most legal aid offices make referrals to pro bono lawyers.

Source : http://www.illinoislawyerfinder.com

The Facts you should know before Hire the Best Attorney for You

Not easy to find a lawyer that you can rely on in dealing with the problem you’re facing. The information below explains how we should to hire professional lawyers. There are some basic facts you should know:

  • Your lawyer must be completely loyal to you with no conflicts of interest. This means he or she must have no competing interests with other persons, including the lawyer’s own interests.
  • Your lawyer must know all the facts of the case – including those that may appear unfavorable to your cause. Furthermore, they must not disclose those facts to anyone without your consent unless required to do so by law. Your lawyer must keep your confidences. At the same time, your lawyer must be loyal to the administration of justice. So, while he or she may use in your behalf all legitimate means, your lawyer must not resort to illegal or unethical tactics or untruths.
  • Your lawyer must be licensed to practice law in Illinois. The preparation for such a law license and legal practice requires a great deal of time, hard work and expense. The licensed lawyer must graduate from an accredited law school and must pass the Illinois bar examination, a rigid test of knowledge in all fields of law. Finally, he or she must submit to an examination of personal character and fitness to practice law before being admitted to the bar.
  • You should feel comfortable with your lawyer. Most people select as their lawyer one whom they have met or is recommended by friends or relatives. When this is not possible, advice may be sought by contacting a referral service, such as the Illinois State Bar Association lawyer referral service at www.IllinoisLawyerFinder.com. However the selection is made, you should have confidence in the lawyer who undertakes to represent you.

Source : http://www.illinoislawyerfinder.com

ACC Label offering labelling expertise to companies interested in marketing food products in Canada.

ACC Label is a team of nutritionists, food scientists and translators offering labelling expertise to companies interested in marketing food products in Canada.

Food labelling is a crucial part of product development. Food products may be nutritious, delicious, and attractively packaged, but unless their labels conform to Canadian regulations, they may not be sold in Canada.

They provide database and laboratory nutritional analysis to determine the nutritional composition [protein, fat, carbohydrate, etc.] of food products.

Database analysis consists of determining a products nutritional content on the basis of the nutritional values of its ingredients. Good database analysis, however, is not just a matter of entering data into nutritional analysis software and letting the computer do the rest. Extensive food science and nutrition knowledge are necessary to ensure reliable data. ACC Label’s nutritionists have perfected the database analysis methodology to provide accurate results.

Laboratory analyses consist of chemical breakdown of the actual products. ACC Label contracts with laboratories fully accredited by the Standards Council of Canada for such analyses.

Once the nutritional composition of the food product is known, ACC Label produces compliant, print-ready Nutrition Facts tables.

In addition to nutritional labelling, ACC Label provides food label regulatory analysis services. They scrutinize the labels to:

1.determine whether all the mandatory labelling elements are displayed as required by regulations;

2.ensure no label elements are misleading and illegal;

3.recommend appropriate value-added claims [e.g. “Organic”, “Source of “, etc.];

4.etc.

The importance of the legal compliance of food labels cannot be overemphasized, as the consequences of inadequate labelling can be very costly in fines, seizures, label reprints, etc.

Equally important is the linguistic quality of texts. Just as poor graphic design or low quality packaging, poorly written texts convey carelessness and give the impression that the product is of inferior quality.

For outstanding linguistic quality on food labels, you want to rely on people passionate about words who can convey messages with style. Also, you want people with a good knowledge of Canadian labelling requirements who will not alter the legal compliance of your labels. Finally, you want someone familiar with the particularities of the two Canadian official languages, as Canadian French and Canadian English differ from Parisian French and US English.

To complement their nutritional and label regulatory analysis services, ACC Labels offers the linguistic services you need, whether you speak English, French, Italian or Chinese.

The production and sale of quality food products is a challenge in itself. Dealing with food labelling regulations, nutritional analysis and linguistics is a totally different matter. To food manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers who wish to focus on what they do the best, ACC Label offers peace of mind with respect to their food labelling needs.

Visit ACC Label for more information.

Legal Aid will overhaul and review Family law services

The legal service is considering a raft of changes to try and make its support more accessible to vulnerable people.

We know that lengthy, protracted court cases are not good for anyone, particularly where children are involved.

Victoria Legal Aid will overhaul its family law services to give more help to people whose first encounter with the labyrinthine legal system occurs when they go to court to get a family violence intervention order.

Nicole Rich

People who go to the Magistrates Court to apply for family violence intervention orders could be linked with help to solve their other family law problems.

For the first time since 1974 the service has launched a comprehensive review, responding in part to the huge increase in  people appearing in court on family violence matters.

Statewide, the number of family violence intervention order applications increased 46 per cent between 2009 and 2014.

The legal service is also considering other changes: expanding its outreach services, providing more duty lawyers at family courts, and improving legal information for community workers who help vulnerable people.

On Monday it released an “options” paper, canvassing possibilities put forward by those within the sector and calling for submissions from the public.

Family Youth and Children’s Law director Nicole Rich said well-designed family law services prevented legal problems and resolved disputes quickly.

“We know that lengthy, protracted court cases are not good for anyone, particularly where children are involved,” Ms Rich said.

Early talks highlighted the need to help clients navigate the incredibly complex family law system, she said.

In 2013, Victoria Legal Aid made changes to its eligibility guidelines in order to balance the books in the face of record demand for family mediation and family law proceedings.

In September 2014, Victoria Legal Aid announced it would restore free legal help for family violence victims in child custody battles, reversing the cuts that left some to face their attackers in court alone.

“We acknowledge that these changes have been difficult for many people and we have recently taken action to reduce the effects of these on some of our most vulnerable clients,” the review paper said on Monday.

Federal funding for state legal aid commissions has declined from half in 1997 to about a third of all funding.

Women’s Legal Service senior lawyer Pasana Mutha-Merennege said the changes to funding in 2013 had seen some clients lose their family law funding during trial.

To open the review up to consultation was a positive step, Ms Mutha-Merennege said.

Source : http://www.theage.com.au

An Example Case of Legal Madness

When your ex decides to file phony abuse allegations so that you’re fighting a restraining order during a divorce case, the legal process is in two stages. The first “ex parte” hearing is one which only needs to be attended by the plaintiff, and a temporary order can be filed against you, which is then served in person. The second formal hearing is where you get a chance to defend yourself against it becoming a permanent order. In-between those two dates you are under the restraining order’s standard restrictions (firearms confiscation, a no contact order, and so on).

Unfortunately for those of us fighting an order because of false accusations, the first hearing is one where judges prefer to “err on the side of caution”. In practical terms, this means that the temporary orders are almost always granted against the defendant. Whilst in legitimate cases this is a good thing, it does lead to sly divorce tactics being employed during many breakups.

One prominent example of where the judge’s tendency to automatically grant the temporary order was abused is in the case of television presenter David Letterman. It reminds us of the ease with which the ex parte hearing judges grant restraining orders, effectively cutting fathers off from their kids until those fathers have a chance to respond in court several weeks later.

Basically, a deranged female fan from New Mexico filed restraining order paperwork against him in 2005. At the ex parte court hearing, Colleen Nestler of Santa Fe explained that the defendant (Letterman) had been harassing her since 1994 into marrying him, as well as exerting pressure to become a co-host on his talk show. He’d been responsible for her bankruptcy declaration and ongoing sleep deprivation problems. The temporary restraining order was granted against Letterman, and a court date set for a second hearing so he could argue his defense.

The method of Letterman’s harassment of this lady was… coded messages and facial expressions in his television presentations. Even more disturbing is that when asked if he might have made a mistake, Judge Sanchez stated in the negative.

The fact is that an applicant need only assert a “fear” of violence in most states for the judge to grant the temporary order, even if none has occurred. A new development in some counties is that applications can be made by telephone, without the need to attend county court the same day.

This situation sums up what fathers are up against when fighting a restraining order as part of strategic divorce maneuvers. The only difference is that their stories aren’t widely publicised to mass outrage, and they often don’t have expensive lawyers to descend upon the case to petition a dismissal before the second appointed court date. Meaning that they don’t get to see their children in the meantime.

Tips for Choosing A Good Bankruptcy Attorney

When you‘re having trouble bankruptcy, and you want to appoint a lawyer to take care of your bankruptcy. Then choose a lawyer who has a good track record, and professional. There are some factors to be aware of when picking the right legal professional to aid you:

1. Consult the Lawyer or attorney: The initial step might seem noticeable, but yet take advantage of the free initial consultations provided by a reliable legal professionals! When you go into your free initial appointment, be sure you meet with a lawyer (not a paralegal or a law clerk) face to face.

2. Study: Do a little primary bankruptcy study well before making at a initial free discussion. This can provide a more satisfying advice about what the legal practitioner is discussing throughout the session. Additionally, it can help you differentiate between professional and also inexperienced lawyers.

3. Communication: Communicating is important for the lawyer or attorney-client relationships. When your court case proceeds, it is significant that you simply disclose all of your points to your own legal representative, and thus you need to make sure to find a lawyer which you feel safe talking with. Will the attorney frighten you, or do you experience comfortable and optimistic when interacting with the attorney?

4. Knowledge: Be pretty careful of the lawyers which often facilitate mainly chapter 7 customers, and who exactly will not tackle any chapter 13 lawsuits. This is simply not to convey that your legal representative simply cannot efficiently work with any chapter 7 court case, but yet this kind of legal professional wouldn’t distinguish all your products. You wish to be certain chapter 7 bankruptcy is the better part for your needs prior to when you retain an attorney for the chapter 7 bankruptcy. It is best to engage a lawyer that’s well versed in both chapters in order to be sure that you may be declaring the correct chapter.

5. The Smell Analysis: Thats best suited, follow onto your nose! However , if, within your free consultation, you’ll get the experience that this lawyer or attorney isn’t the most reliable individual in the book, trust your gut impulse. If you agree you can rely on the visiting legal practitioner, the legal professional appears sincere, and so the lawyer is normally trained in the laws, believe in gut instinct.

6. Few good Questions you should ask:

a.Will your attorney or even a non-attorney actually be preparing your application? (Keep clear from Bankruptcy “mills”)

b.Will probably a lawyer go along with you to your current 341(a) hearing?

c.Exactly how long has the firm been practicing bankruptcy legislation?

The importance of hiring a professional DUI Lawyers

According to various DUI Lawyers around the states, its not impossible for the government authorities to follow the tough implementation of drunk driving laws to all car drivers and motorists in any pace. Any person suspected of drunk driving usually undergo car inspection and a series of tests executed by the arresting officers. If a person is proven to be driving while intoxicated, possible DUI conviction will follow. Like many other places in the world, drunk driving is one of the most common criminal cases that is happening to any states in the U.S.. And the fact is, United States has the most number of drunk driving incidents in a year.

Most DUI Lawyers encounter people who are not aware of the possible consequences of the offense they have committed, and most of the time, they don’t have any idea on where to find someone who can help them during this complicated situation. Therefore, most of them end up in jail, have their license hold for revocation and sometimes they ask to pay a high amount of related fines. It is always the result of people’s unawareness on the importance of hiring a professional DUI Lawyers.

Having arrested of drunk driving doesn’t always mean that you are guilty, as what most DUI Lawyers would say. People who committed the offense find it difficult in dealing with this kind of situation, that’s why they just voluntarily submit themselves for police investigation. But, if they are just aware of the things they need to do during this situation, they may not be suffering from the serious charges of DUI.

In cases like DUI, not all the time that the offenders are responsible for the accusation. So, when you are facing such offense, it is very important to consider the help of a good DUI Lawyers that can help you defend your case. An experienced DUI Lawyers are the one who are knowledgeable in dealing with this complicated cases of DUI. They have the ability to defend your case to any court and protect you from having convicted of DUI. So, before anything turn to worst, make a wise decision, hire a quality DUI Lawyers that can stand in behalf of you in any situation to regain tour freedom and fight for your legal rights. With the help of a DUI lawyers, you can always assure the possibility of winning your case.